Tagging accuracy analysis on part-of-speech taggers

Part of Speech (POS) Tagging can be applied by several tools and several programming languages. This work focuses on the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) library in the Python environment and the gold standard corpora installable. The corpora and tagging methods are analyzed and compared by using the Python language. Different taggers are analyzed according to their tagging accuracies with data from three different corpora. In this study, we have analyzed Brown, Penn Treebank and NPS Chat corpuses. The taggers we have used for the analysis are; default tagger, regex tagger, n-gram taggers. We have applied all taggers to these three corpuses, resultantly we have shown that whereas Unigram tagger does the best tagging in all corpora, the combination of taggers does better if it is correctly ordered. Additionally, we have seen that NPS Chat Corpus gives different accuracy results than the other two corpuses.

Erişime Açık
Görüntülenme
3
22.03.2024 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
22.03.2024 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
19 Nisan 2024 14:25
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
Tam Metin
Tam Metin İndirmek için tıklayın Ön izleme
Detaylı Görünüm
Eser Adı
(dc.title)
Tagging accuracy analysis on part-of-speech taggers
Yayın Türü
(dc.type)
Makale
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
YUMUŞAK, Semih
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
DOĞDU, Erdoğan
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
KODAZ, Halife
Atıf Dizini
(dc.source.database)
Wos
Atıf Dizini
(dc.source.database)
Scopus
Yayın Tarihi
(dc.date.issued)
2014
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
(dc.date.accessioned)
2019-07-10T08:21:16Z
Açık Erişim tarihi
(dc.date.available)
2019-07-10T08:21:16Z
ISSN
(dc.identifier.issn)
2327-5227
Özet
(dc.description.abstract)
Part of Speech (POS) Tagging can be applied by several tools and several programming languages. This work focuses on the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) library in the Python environment and the gold standard corpora installable. The corpora and tagging methods are analyzed and compared by using the Python language. Different taggers are analyzed according to their tagging accuracies with data from three different corpora. In this study, we have analyzed Brown, Penn Treebank and NPS Chat corpuses. The taggers we have used for the analysis are; default tagger, regex tagger, n-gram taggers. We have applied all taggers to these three corpuses, resultantly we have shown that whereas Unigram tagger does the best tagging in all corpora, the combination of taggers does better if it is correctly ordered. Additionally, we have seen that NPS Chat Corpus gives different accuracy results than the other two corpuses.
Yayın Dili
(dc.language.iso)
en
Tek Biçim Adres
(dc.identifier.uri)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/1048
Analizler
Yayın Görüntülenme
Yayın Görüntülenme
Erişilen ülkeler
Erişilen şehirler
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve cerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms