Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia

  • Yazar/lar SEVİNÇ, Barış
    OKUŞ, Ahmet
    AY, Serden
    AKSOY, Nergis
    KARAHAN, Ömer
  • Yayın Türü Makale
  • Yayın Tarihi 2018
  • DOI Numarası 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
  • Yayıncı AVES İbrahim KARA
  • Tek Biçim Adres http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/2916

Objective: Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an ideal treatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques. Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: Onlay and sublay groups. Recurrences were evaluated by performing a physical examination. Results: The median follow-up was 37.1 (26.6 to 46.5) months. In the onlay group, the mean operation time was significantly shorter. However, in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications, the sublay group had significantly better results. The recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups (6% in the onlay group and 2% in the sublay group). Conclusion: In the treatment of incisional hernia, sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications. Both techniques have similar recurrence rates. © 2018 Turkish Surgical Association.

  • Koleksiyonlar
Erişime Açık
Görüntülenme
2
22.03.2024 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
22.03.2024 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
19 Nisan 2024 14:25
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
Tam Metin
Tam Metin İndirmek için tıklayın Ön izleme
Detaylı Görünüm
Eser Adı
(dc.title)
Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia
Yayın Türü
(dc.type)
Makale
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
SEVİNÇ, Barış
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
OKUŞ, Ahmet
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
AY, Serden
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
AKSOY, Nergis
Yazar/lar
(dc.contributor.author)
KARAHAN, Ömer
DOI Numarası
(dc.identifier.doi)
10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
Atıf Dizini
(dc.source.database)
Scopus
Yayıncı
(dc.publisher)
AVES İbrahim KARA
Yayın Tarihi
(dc.date.issued)
2018
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
(dc.date.accessioned)
2020-08-07T12:53:50Z
Açık Erişim tarihi
(dc.date.available)
2020-08-07T12:53:50Z
Kaynak
(dc.source)
Turkish Journal of Surgery
ISSN
(dc.identifier.issn)
25646850 (ISSN)
Özet
(dc.description.abstract)
Objective: Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an ideal treatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques. Material and Methods: In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: Onlay and sublay groups. Recurrences were evaluated by performing a physical examination. Results: The median follow-up was 37.1 (26.6 to 46.5) months. In the onlay group, the mean operation time was significantly shorter. However, in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications, the sublay group had significantly better results. The recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups (6% in the onlay group and 2% in the sublay group). Conclusion: In the treatment of incisional hernia, sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications. Both techniques have similar recurrence rates. © 2018 Turkish Surgical Association.
Yayın Dili
(dc.language.iso)
en
Tek Biçim Adres
(dc.identifier.uri)
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/2916
Analizler
Yayın Görüntülenme
Yayın Görüntülenme
Erişilen ülkeler
Erişilen şehirler
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve cerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms