[email protected] Karatay
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   [email protected] Karatay
  • ARAŞTIRMA ÇIKTILARI
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   [email protected] Karatay
  • ARAŞTIRMA ÇIKTILARI
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Biomechanical comparison of transdiscal fixation and posterior fixation with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of L5-S1 lumbosacral joint.

Özalp, Hakan; Özkaya, Mustafa; Yaman, Onur; Demir, Teyfik
  • BibTex
  • EndNote (RIS)
Loading
Thumbnail
Date
2018-04
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/3306
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Transdiscal screw fixation is generally performed in the treatment of high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The main thought of the study is that the biomechanical performances of the transdiscal pedicle screw fixation can be identical to standard posterior pedicle screw fixations with or without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion. Lumbosacral portions and pelvises of 45 healthy lambs' vertebrae were dissected. Animal cadavers were randomly and equally divided into three groups for instrumentation. Three fixation systems, L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation, L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion, and L5-S1 transdiscal pedicle screw fixation, were generated. Axial compression, flexion, and torsion tests were conducted on test samples of each system. In axial compression, L5-S1 transdiscal fixation was less stiff than L5-S1 posterior pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage insertion. There were no significant differences between groups in flexion. Furthermore, L5-S1 posterior fixation was stiffest under torsional loads. When axial compression and flexion loads are taken into consideration, transdiscal fixation can be alternatively used instead of posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis because it satisfies enough stability. However, in torsion, posterior fixation is shown as a better option due to its higher stiffness....  Show more  Show less
Item type
Article Article
Collections
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu [80]

- KTO Karatay Kutuphanesi
- KTO Karatay Universitesi
- Contact Us / Send Feedback
DSpace software
Gemini
 

 

Browse

Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy lcAuthorBy TypeBy publisherBy languageBy rightsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy lcAuthorBy TypeBy publisherBy languageBy rights

My Account

LoginRegister

- KTO Karatay Kutuphanesi
- KTO Karatay Universitesi
- Contact Us / Send Feedback
DSpace software
Gemini