• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • ARAŞTIRMA ÇIKTILARI
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • ARAŞTIRMA ÇIKTILARI
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Can we predict patients that will not benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation? A novel scoring system in intensive care: The imv mortality prediction score (IMPRES)

Thumbnail
View/Open
Can we predict patients that.pdf (541.8Kb)
Date
2019
Author
ÖZLÜ, Tevfik
PEHLİVANLAR KÜÇÜK, Mehtap
KAYA, Akın
YARAR, Esra
KIRAKLI, Sami Cenk
ŞENGÖREN DİKİŞ, Özlem
KEFELİ ÇELİK, Hale
ÖZKAN, Serdar
BEKTAŞ AKSOY, Hayriye
KÜÇÜK, Ahmet Oğuzhan
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background/aim: The present study aimed to define the clinical and laboratory criteria for predicting patients that will not benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment and determine the prediction of mortality and prognosis of these critical ill patients. Materials and methods: The study was designed as an observational, multicenter, prospective, and cross-sectional clinical study. It was conducted by 75 researchers at 41 centers in intensive care units (ICUs) located in various geographical areas of Turkey. It included a total of 1463 ICU patients who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment. A total of 158 parameters were examined via logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for mortality; using these data, the IMV Mortality Prediction Score (IMPRES) scoring system was developed. Results: The following cut-off scores were used to indicate mortality risk: <2, low risk; 2–5, moderate risk; 5.1–8, high risk; >8, very high risk. There was a 26.8% mortality rate among the 254 patients who had a total IMPRES score of lower than 2. The mortality rate was 93.3% for patients with total IMPRES scores of greater than 8 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The present study included a large number of patients from various geographical areas of the country who were admitted to various types of ICUs, had diverse diagnoses and comorbidities, were intubated with various indications in either urgent or elective settings, and were followed by physicians from various specialties. Therefore, our data are more general and can be applied to a broader population. This study devised a new scoring system for decision-making for critically ill patients as to whether they need to be intubated or not and presents a rapid and accurate prediction of mortality and prognosis prior to ICU admission using simple clinical data. © TÜBİTAK.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12498/2828
Collections
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [527]





Creative Commons License
DSpace@Karatay by Karatay University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2022  LYRASIS
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 



| Yönerge | Rehber | İletişim |

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_typeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_type

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2022  LYRASIS
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV